|
|
. |
Countdown With Keith Olbermann Thursday, May 31, 2007 Email your comments to: jharrissphillips@gmail.com The following transcript appears on Countdown's site, apart of msnbc.com. Click here for more infomation.
|
STEWART: If you have seen a police car chase on TV
lately, theres a reason why more likely than not its low speed. In our
number two story on the COUNTDOWN, the risks of a high-speed chases. Depending on
the crime, it would seem police are better off letting the speeding vehicle escape than
weaving through heavy traffic to catch the culprit. There are people in the D.C. are who not
doubt think this. Two people dead, 15 people injured, including two police officers,
all because one motorcycle was speeding on the Capital Beltway outside A police cruiser tried to cut off the
motorcycle, which swerved and sped off. The police car then slammed into another
vehicle, which caused that car to become airborne, over the median, and into oncoming
traffic. The chain reaction crash that followed involved five more cars. All
told, the seven car pile up closed down most lanes of traffic for five hours. The two innocent motorists have been
since identified as Kevin McCarter (ph) of JOHN PHILLIPS, PURSUITWATCH.ORG:
Absolutely, thanks for having me. STEWART: I want to break this
down, focusing first on the incident last night. We dont have video of that
actual event or specific details yet, but generally, why would police ever try to
intercept a speeding vehicle on a freeway or highway during rush hour? PHILLIPS: I dont know.
I dont know what to tell you. I cant tell you what the officers
were thinking. I cant explain why they would make that decision at a time like
that, during rush hour traffic. First off, even if it was a car, I wouldnt be
able to justify the decision, much less a motorcycle, which could outrun just about any
police car there is anyway. STEWART: Who usually makes the
call about when to go into a chase mode, specifically a high-speed chase? PHILLIPS: It varies. It
could vary from the individual officer themselves up the chain of command. STEWART: A lot of people talk
about low-speed chases. Are there risks involved there as well? I mean, we
shouldnt just assume that thats the safe way to go. PHILLIPS: I think any chase is a
chase in my book. You can kill someone going 10 miles an hour. You can kill
someone going 110 miles an hour. It doesnt matter. A chase is a chase.
STEWART: On your site, you write
that mandatory reporting of pursuit activity should be required by law enforcement
agencies. How do you think that would affect things? PHILLIPS: I think you would see
right nowyou would see a spike in the number of fatalities, not so much a spike.
But as of right now its a voluntary procedure, and that leads to a lower
number than the actual number. Also, many times a report is filed, lets say,
the day after and a victim were to die three days later, so they might not count, even
though they were clearly a victim. STEWART: Shouldnt there be
some sort of sliding scale based on the offense? I mean, a kid steals a purse, jumps
in his own car. That has to be a whole lot different than a murderer or car jacking
someone and taking off. PHILLIPS: Absolutely. What
weve done here in Many times its just a dumb, stupid
kid making a very bad decision. Its not worth it. Its
that simple. STEWART: John, how often do police
review these policies and jurisdiction change or adapt their updates, their pursuit books?
PHILLIPS: I think were
starting to see a trend of more restrictive policies. So policies that are not
allowing officers to pursue at will. There is, although, a little bit of
peoplethere are some people who are against that. But I think once these
decisions are made to make policies more restrictive that everyone benefits and everyone
agrees with that too. STEWART: John Phillips, the
president of PursuitWatch.org, thanks for taking the time tonight. PHILLIPS: Absolutely, it was my
pleasure.
|
|
|